Sad Lessons from the Land of the Rising Sun

     The recent devastation created by the earthquake and subsequent tsunami, and its effect on the  already battered economy and self esteem of Japan is hard to watch.  The damage will take years to unravel, and the rapidly aging population may simply lack the energy and will to see through to the end the immense effort required to restore the foundations of a flourishing economy.  The damage created by the natural disaster was severe, but certainly not the index blow.  Japan has been under several decades of misdirected investment and Keynesian philosophy that left it wide open to the final blow of that cascading wave of water.   A clear example of what not to do to a vibrant economic process is present for all to see, but the current caretakers of the American economy seem to have paid the lessons no heed and, in an unconscionable way appear determined to repeat Japan’s mis-steps on an ever more massive scale.

      The troubles for Japan in the late 1980’s were set into motion at the very point at which the Japanese economic miracle was being heralded as an unstoppable force and the successor to post world war America’s place as the world’s pre-eminent world economic power.  Article after article heralded Japan’s example as one America would do best to emulate or face has been status.  This was smart capitalism, with government support of fledgling industries, cradle to grave guarantees to the worker who gave his life long loyalties to his company, and teamwork and equal credit and reward instead of entrepreneurial incentive and unequal outcomes.  The Japanese behemoth had become the second largest economy in the world, and was rapidly closing on the largest, with a combination of creative industrial efficiencies and the outsourcing of mundane work and production to the little Asian Tigers of Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, and even China.  The United States with its reliance on individual work ethic, nasty competition, market self corrections, and unequal reward seemed terribly outdated.

     The parallels with cresting Japan of 1990 and our own current direction is ominously similar.  The problem began with the bursting of a grossly over inflated real estate bubble in Japan, and the intolerable strain on the banking industry leading to bank default under the pressures of abandoned or intolerable loans.  The result was a deep recession which brought the government to fore in its presumed role as Japan’s guarantor of success.  The political elites in Japan determined the way out of the crisis was a sustained enormous stimulus, with the heaviest injection into Japan’s infrastructure – roads, bridges, planes, and trains.  Japan’s debt rapidly ballooned as “investments” progressively lost their targeted appearance and politicians eager to please their constituents provided the funds for airports with no passengers, bridges with no traffic, trains with no economic basis, and roads to nowhere.  The Japanese government dumped over 2 trillion dollars between 1991 and 1995 on government targeting projects with little rationalization for their need or their success.  The result to the Japanese economic recovery of that enormous public investment – just about nothing.  The hidden result was the majority of investment went to rural areas and local construction companies, with almost no connectivity to product, and an inverse effect on private enterprise by driving out private investors.  It seemed the government proved absolutely incapable of “predicting” economic winners, settling for political rather than economic considerations.  The result of all the spending? An incredible debt accumulation 180% of Japan’s gross domestic product and a two decade stagnation of the economic miracle, with an economic growth of only 3% of GDP over the twenty years of 1991-2010 compared to 444% growth from the previous twenty years of 1971-1990. 

     A fascinating article, in of all places the New York Times, was published in 2009 was written by Martin Fackler at the time the Obama stimulus was put forth, reviewing the history of the Japanese experience, and mentioning the republican party’s concern that utilizing governmental stimulus rather than unshackiling private enterprise could lead to similar results.  The warning was telling – over 3.6 trillion dollars of debt spending stimulus to deal with the presumed crisis of a mortgage bubble over the last two and one half years has resulted in net job losses, cascading debt, targeted investment in non-market supported industries, and stagnant economic recovery with the risk of a double dip recession looming.  The reaction of the government and Keynesian supporters such as Paul Krugman ?  The stimulus may not have been “large enough”, trains and windmills will save the day, and taxing the rich appropriately will pay for the burgeoning investments. A close look at the tax totality puts the premise to shame.

     History tells us that mistakes are repeated, not by ignorance of the past, but in willful disregard of the lessons learned. Once again a mighty economy is being progressively brought to its knees by a government that thinks it knows better, and can be fairer than natural forces in correcting inequities. It is embarrassing that intellectuals continue to fall for this loser of an economic philosophy that has done more damage to the average individual than any army of vicious capitalist roaders. The public is slow to understand, but understand they must. Leaders that recognize human nature, not those who rail against it, are a priceless value, that continues to be under-appreciated. It seems it takes a village to wreck what every individual in the village struggled so hard to build. Pick your leaders carefully in the coming months, or we will soon have the chance to look up in a few years and wonder what the tsunami was that hit us.

Duty Calls

     Every generation hopes for a leader that transcends the self absorption and indecisiveness that consumes the political discourse at various critical times in history to become a beacon of clarity and direction to the benefit of all. The founding of the nation, so fragile in birth, received a framework for all future leaders through the calm and steady George Washington. The country was consumed with insurmountable philosophic division in 1860, leading to Civil War, discovering a leader in Abraham Lincoln, who achieved the impossible task of translating the country’s original founding principles into a more modern version that restored unity when all thought it lost. The nation found in Theodore Roosevelt a unique vehicle for the country achieving a position as a world power while restoring the promise to the individual citizen of a fair shake in their own world. In its greatest test ever, buffeted by the twin catastrophes of great depression and apocalyptic war, the nation was steadily and safely led to the position of superpower by Franklin Roosevelt. Finally, out of a crisis of confidence in which many thought the nation’s best years behind it, Ronald Reagan restored a nation’s vitality and in each individual promise for a better tomorrow.

     Every generation hopes for such a leader, and this generation is no different. The current crisis is self created, with a burgeoning national debt progressively suffocating all flexibility for addressing the nation’s needs, and inevitably draining the nation’s life force. Like all previous crisis situations, the political landscape is filled with pretenders and charlatans, deniers and demagogues, mediocrity and downright mendacity. The simplistic contribution of a self absorbed population to its own ills in welcoming an entitlement Trojan horse into its own future, feeds the comfort of all the sunshine patriots who claim the crisis is overblown or simply addressed at a later time.

     The numbers are staggering – a 14.2 trillion dollar national debt, equal to the gross domestic product and expected to double within ten years, 4.6 trillion in US debt held by foreign countries, an indescribable 113.2 trillion dollars owed future generations in unfunded liabilities, and an estimated incurred debt per citizen of 51,000 dollars. Yet, the recent response of both congress and President was to pile on further debt and unfunded liabilities a a record level in complete disdain for the gathering storm.  No leaders here, and certainly false and fatuous hope and change.

     Like earlier times a leader has arisen from unassuming quarters, a back waters district in southeastern Wisconsin, and with no other calling than his profound desire to assure a nation worth inhabiting for his own small children. This leader, Paul Ryan, (Ramparts People We Should Know #4), has decided to put into action against all odds a means for this nation’s salvation. He has determined like all great leaders before him, that the position to lead is in front with clarity and courage. Like all great leaders he will face a storm of resistance and undercutting, and will be abandoned at times by his erstwhile friends, afraid of the heat. He will be impugned by the chief pretender, who adrift in a sea of his own inconsistencies and lacking in any semblance of original thinking, will see him as a threat and look to destroy him. Like all great leaders before him, I think Paul Ryan has realized that it is his time and his calling to bring America back from the brink. He has stated that his quest is not a personal one, but I foresee the willful force of history calling him to assume the mantle that he has to this point denied. Unfortunately for Paul Ryan and his desire to be an initiator but not the vehicle of change , he will soon find out, that he is the right one, at the right time.  Paul Ryan is about to realize his own truth….A Nation’s Duty Calls.

While Rome Burns

     In a no holds bared debate, the US Senate recently reviewed two plans for cutting budgetary items in the residual 2010 fiscal year.  This was required was due to the lassitude of the previous reactionary Congress, recently voted out of office by the American public, who found themselves unable to perform their constitutional duties and submit an actual budget, while still managing to spend trillions.  The new Republican led Congressional House of Representatives determined to submit at least an effort at budgetary sanity, proposing a 61 billion dollar reduction in projected spending, considerably below their stated goal of 100 billion.  The US Senate, still in the hands of the Democrat party, countered with a paltry 4 billion dollar reduction plan.  The good news is, after considering both plans, the Senate determined to reject both as being too draconian.  The Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in an effort to explain the defeat, stated that examples such as the cancelling of public funds for prestigious budgetary items such as National Endowment for the Arts would eliminate the public’s opportunity to such products as the “Cowboy Poetry Festival” that had provided entertainment to thousands.

     In other news, the United States of America declared a deficit of expenditures over income of  223 billion dollars for the month of February alone.  To put this in perspective, the budgetary deficit for the entire year of 2007 was 163 billion.  At the current pace, the United States of America is on pace to run an over 2 Trillion dollar deficit for 2011.  This would put the first three years of the Obama presidency at a staggering pace of deficit spending of over 4.7 Trillion dollars, racking up more debt in three years than the government of the United States incurred in the first 220 years as a nation.   The estimated effect on borrowed monetary resources to pay such indebtedness results in the expectation the interest payments on the debt by 2019 will exceed entitlement health expenditures.  Money going predominantly to foreign sources will dominate the budget. The entitlements we are forever giving ourselves are leading to the funds necessary to keep the party going coming from the Bank of China and the Savings and Loan of Saudi Arabia. That should turn out well.

If you can’t afford emotionally to cut the funding sources for “Cowboy Poetry” for fear of offending, oh, I dont know…cowboys…how are you ever going to take on the monster pie of entitlements? Now that’s going to get some real cowboys angry. Just ask the heroes in Wisconsin who are risking death threats to do just that.

Will Healthcare “Reform” Make U.S. Sick?

     The debate last spring regarding American healthcare was truncated and revolved around lack of access not provision of answers to our pressing healthcare needs. In typical modern legislative fashion, years of carefully wrought considerations regarding the strengths and weakness of the healthcare process were swept “under the rug” in the political rush to claim the moral high ground and achieve “reform”.  As Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel put so succinctly, ” You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”  As is true with so many government decreed “reforms” , the plan passed preserved the worst mechanisms of the previous system, exposing them to an ever larger population, and from a financial standpoint assured a progressive collapse of the segments of the system that are currently working to pay for  those that are progressively not.

     The modern American healthcare system has evolved into 17% of the GDP of the United States and has for sometime threatened to absorb the available discretionary income of the United States economy, suppressing growth and prosperity.  With the recent election, a real debate is finally feasible as the mechanisms of financing “reform” may be carefully reviewed at length.  The challenge of Obamacare was not to solve coverage for all Americans, which it failed to do despite the greatly increased expense, but rather, to assure viability of access to all who wanted it at a price we can all afford.  The passage of the bill only started the debate and its about to get interesting.  Over the next months, the various aspects of financing such an undisciplined reform will come to light in hearings of the House of Representatives, and the discussion to “Repeal” or “Repair” will be the focus of our newly found interest, as expressed in the recent election, in the democratic process.

     Nobel Prize winning University of Chicago economist Gary Becker begins to frame the argument:

Its Going To Be A World of Hurt

     The staggering bill of our profligate spending of the last thirty years is progressively coming to bear not only on the national level, but on the state and municipal levels as well.  A recent study shows our state by state indebtedness is now approaching a trillion dollars and the ability to structure solid payment plans by state legislatures is steadily diminishing.  The Pew Center records that only four states are currently in a budgetary position to successfully fund their future pension and health care mandates and their position is rapidly slipping as well. 

     How did we get ourselves in this ridiculous mess?  The old fashioned way – spending without control for processes we had no intent on paying for through the current generation, assuming the growing economy would forever shield and cover our inability to spend within our means, and continuing to elect corrupted politicians who bought re-elections with the votes of monopolizing public employee unions secured with ever more gluttonous pension and healthcare benefits.

     The current national hero in the fight for fiscal sanity is the rotund pitbull governor of New Jersey Chris Christie who has been declared mean and a bully for simply stating the obvious- that New Jersey is out of money currently with an over 11 billion dollar current deficit and, spectacularly, out of future money with over 100 billion of unfunded mandates to public services and employee unions.  the bad news? – New Jersey is only one of many states in this situation of intolerable budget choices, and that the bill may come due as early as next summer.

    
This next summer is the time that many state and municipal bonds come due in states that are approaching default status.  It may well be that one of the most secure forms of investment by major banks may go the way of default similar to the loans related to the housing collapse of two years ago, leaving many banks highly vulnerable and over leveraged.  Can you say double dip recession?

     HotAir.com presents an important sixty minutes video that is worth the initial commercials and every bit of its extended view.  Hopefully the recent elections put enough adults in place that the day of reckoning does not come forth without an eventual day of salvation.

People We Should Know #5 – Nigel Farage

     The western world is seeing a developing crisis that shows no identifiable end in sight.  Presumptively a crisis of economic stability, it is fundamentally a crisis of leaders and leadership. With the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the dramatic end of direct Soviet threat to western institutions, the nations victoriously transcendent were those with traditions of capitalist democracy and democratic principles.  Instead of showing inspired leadership to the developing world as to the human benefits of individual freedom and expression, the west has collapsed into a post cold war funk of navel gazing, self flagellation, isolationist rhetoric, and self absorbed societal economies rewarding personal security not innovation and risk.  The sputtering exception has been the United States, briefly awoken by a direct attack on its nationhood and democratic principles on 09/11/2001, taking an aggressive tact with Great Britain to ferret out the threats to basic western principles in Afghanistan and Iraq, only to see little secondary support from its fellow democratic states, and progressive deterioration of their own population’s will. 

     The approaching climax of the challenge to western will is the two headed monster of the farce of global climate extremism, and efforts to pay for and maintain a social safety net well beyond those who actually need it.  I have recently reviewed the underlying agenda of climate change extremists epitomized in the Neue Zuricher Zeitung interview of German Economist and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change member Ottmar Edenhofer finally exclaiming the underlying agenda of climate change, climate policy is about re-distributing the world’s wealth.”  The second and equally precarious trend is the burgeoning anti-democratic trends in western nations taken to protect the elaborate personal security cocoon that has come to dominate western society and threatens its very economic health and stability.  The trend shows itself in progressively anti-market financial bailouts, government takeovers of bankrupt and struggling companies,  and re-distribution stimulus policies.   The development of the European Union with a progressively aggressive supra-national parliament and a binding single currency across 16 nations, the Euro, has managed in recessionary times, to see the precarious nature of rigid governmental over-structure and anti-democratic tendencies.  In its bailout of two economically undisciplined members, Greece, and now Ireland, it has positioned itself for real economic crisis when larger nation members like Spain and Italy present unbailoutable dilemmas.

      Enter Nigel Farage.  Farage is a member of the United Kingdom Independence Party, a breakaway conservative British party formed when the European Union developed a formal governmental structure with the Maastricht Treaty of 1993.  Farage and the party are EU sceptics to the extreme, believing that the anti-democratic tendencies of EU bureaucrats rarely have the interests of individual Europeans at heart and on every occasion they could, have separated the local individual from having a say in economic and political decisions. His brand of politician is seen in more and more of the traditional European democracies as local control is steadily being usurped by the EU bureaucrats in Belgium.  The artificial edifice of the EU is falling on the sword of inflexible economic policy and Farage is gleefully helping the sword’s direction.  His view of the need to fight for the individual European nation to determine its best destiny democratically has significant tea party strains in it,  and his recent blast at the European Parliament savaging the policy of bailout was in the best traditions of in your face British parliamentary debate.  Farage is no outlier; his party won the second highest total  in British elections for European parliament, out-polling the Labour party,  and with the developing economic crisis on the continent definitely a Person We Should Know as Great Britain grapples with its outsiders role in the philosophical debate as  to the role of individual enterprise and governmental regulation in the age we live.

A Deficit Debacle

     The preliminary numbers from the Congressional Budget Office are in for fiscal 2010 and they are, unsurprisingly, as bad as predicted. The combination of completely unharnessed government spending, reduced recessionary receipts, and a progressively unstable entitlement environment have come together in a perfect storm to explode the standard of acceptability accrued over two hundred years of national budgets from 1790 to 2008.  President Obama continues to maintain a relative detachment to the whole spending debacle, recently having proposed an additional 50 billion in “stimulus” spending to follow up the trillion dollars of “stimulus” spending that had apparently little effect on the health of the American economy.  The perspective is a fairly simple one – President George W. Bush, facing the 9/11 recession, fighting two wars, and passing “big government” ventures in education with No Child Left Behind and in Medicare Prescription as a spendthrift “compassionate conservative” managed to amass 2 trillion of deficits over 8 years contributed to the national debt.  President Obama in just 24 months has already expanded the national debt by 2.76 trillion dollars, with no end in sight.   Is it feasible that profligate spending will destroy the American ideal enemy armies and national calamities failed to dent?

     Gateway Pundit tackles this issue head on with an eye opening graphic that crystallizes the proportionality of the current government’s disdain for budgetary discipline:

     At what point does this pattern of spending enter into the theater of the absurd?   The statistics get more dire the closer you look at them.  In a country where a deficit of 4% of GDP was considered outrageous, the current Obama budgets rack up 10% and 9% of GDP respectively. A ridiculous 37 cents of every dollar now spent in the budget goes to deficit spending or service of the debt, not to defending the country, supporting infrastructure improvements, or positioning this country to reach for big ideas.  

     I am approaching the point of numbness to the whole headlong self-destructive behavior.  Once again, it is time for adults to reassert authority, and take back the keys from our undisciplined kids playing recklessly with this nation’s future.  No excuses, people. On November 2nd, 2010 get it done.  Recess is over, and its time to get down to some hard work.

Is Your State Well Run?

      As the election of November 2nd closes in, the national perspective often clouds the fact that this election is very much a plebiscite on the quality of state and local governmental management.  Governors seats and the senate and assembly positions are up for grabs across the nation, and as Tip O’Neill, the old Boston pol once so famously claimed, ‘all politics is local’.   In many ways the consensus on state and local governments often precedes the eventual national direction and concerns, and 2010 is shaping up to be an election about competence.  Chris Christie, in winning the governorship of the very blue state of New Jersey last year on the issue of competence and adult management,  changed the sense of the possible in all state elections and has states with incompetent governmental styles reeling in fear of the potential electoral wave before them.  State governments are frequently under the onus of the requirement for a “balanced” state budget, where the national government has no similar requirement.   State governments who have done a poor job of supporting their local economic advantages, and have instead fed the ballooning demands of state and local employee entitlements, allowing them to devour the discretionary portion of their budgets, are in particular trouble.  When the economy was sufficiently successful to support the spendthrift habits, the balance sheets seemed to work out, but with the recession lingering, states have had to progressively pilfer from other state fund vehicles to make up the difference.  My home state of Wisconsin under democrat governor Jim Doyle has been one of the great thieves, and has seen progressive loss of support in the bond market for its follies.  Wisconsin, an upper Midwestern state long known for effective government, outstanding education, and a diverse economy of both agriculture and manufacturing, has become a progressive loser compared to its better run neighbors in Indiana, Iowa, and Minnesota.  The election in Wisconsin for Governor this year, pitting republican Scott Walker against democrat Tom Barrett, is a particularly  sharp contrast in philosophies of restoration of investment in economic sanity and local industriousness versus the stand-pat support of the safety net against all other needs.  The pattern of local and state competence and economic success is reflected in Standard and Poor’s state bond ratings, which reflect the lender’s confidence in whether their bond support will be realized by return on the borrowed money.  The map not surprisingly gives a pretty clear indication of the state’s most “in trouble” for a coming electoral sea change.

     How does your state compare to your neighbors when put under the microscope of appropriate management of all your states assets and resources?   The web site 24/7 Wall Street has a terrific breakdown of where the fifty states rate in regard to the concept of “well run”, including not only the traditional standard of fiscal information, but also, GDP per capita, debt per capita, credit rating, household income, percent of residents below the poverty line, support of education, support of infrastructure, and health care coverage – all impacting the state’s capacity to meet current needs and successfully invest in its future.   Take a look at the survey and see where your state rates. Wisconsin has always seen itself as an example for the nation, but its rating and its credit status are average at best, thanks to a decade of lack of discipline and focused attention to developing weaknesses. And if you live in California, not so the long ago, the pinnacle of state innovation, economic growth, and educational growth – read’em and weep. On November 2nd, if you don’t finally step up to the plate and vote to start to right your ship, God help you.

The Road To Serfdom

     In an  Internet bookstore with millions of available titles, Amazon.com lists its category best sellers and overall best sellers monthly, an interesting pulse on the  interest areas of the reading public.  The number 1 best seller for all books on Amazon in June of 2010 was  The Road To Serfdom by F.A. Hayek. – WHO?? – It is reasonable to consider with some amazement that an economic treatise written by an obscure Austrian intellectual 66 years ago could captivate such a large segment of the population as to lead all books in all categories.  A book that dominated the usual summer classics, such as the vampire inspired The Passage or the son’s memoir of his father S**t My Father Says , would be assumed by all to have some violent or sexy angle to bring in all these literary stragglers.  Perhaps this is a book about a Serf mafioso who rules over a dangerous road through which a hero must travel to attain a powerful ring…clever premise, but no,  that’s far from the book’s central theme. 

      It turns out that the gripping premise of F.A. Hayek’s book that so absorbed the American public’s attention this summer is a call to intellectual arms to avoid the collectivist mistakes of socialized states and to defend the power of man’s individualism.  How could such ideas written by a relative unknown born in 1899 resonate so strongly this summer? The answer is obvious to those like me who have read Hayek’s treatise.  Its is Hayek’s description of the collectivist impulses of governments promoting good acts that ultimately strangulates the capacity of individuals to achieve success by “developing their own individual gifts and bents”.  Hayek saw the collectivist responses of governments to the world wide depression born of classic liberal utopian desires to level the playing field and eliminate the inequities presented by the capitalist model.  In the process of seeking societal ideals of social justice, grater, equality and security, the social utopian structures common plans that deferentially and without prejudice would “handle our common problems as rationally as possible”.  For these modern planners, “it is not sufficient to design the most rational permanent framework within which various activities would be conducted by individual persons according to their individual plans.  What our planners demand is a central direction of all economic activity according to a single plan, laying down how resources of society should be ‘consciously directed’ to serve particular ends in a definite way.”  Hayek saw the classic argument regarding a totalitarian socialism that neither cared nor understood how the utopian goals were achieved and were merely certain that they be achieved, no matter what the cost, and the democratic socialist who struggled with dictatorial tenets of such utopians, argued only regarding the means, not the ends.  Both fundamentally believed that government must ” centrally direct economic activity if we want to make the distribution of income conform to current ideas of social justice.”  Hayek quoted Benito Mussolini as objectifying the need for central planning to reduce the inequities of individual competition in a modern world – ” We were the first to assert that the more complicated the forms assumed by civilization, the more restricted the freedom of the individual must become.”  benito mussolini (1929).

     Hayek was speaking to an audience dealing with the aggressive impulses of the totalitarian socialists Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin, but asking them to recognize the tendencies in their own threatened democratic world to the less martial but every bit as threatening collectivist strains of their own society.  For Hayek , ”the welfare and happiness of millions cannot be measured on a scale of less and more.”  What becomes inherently clear in the democratic effects on building a collectivist society, is not that the equality of society transcends to an absolute good, but rather, that the benefits of society receive a more equal distribution.  The definition of good or bad can not be left to society to determine benefit, for obviously everyone’s opinion as to good differs, and millions of people’s definition of good differs absolutely.  Inevitably, the direction of relative good can not be left to people to decide as in the end, the decisions in attempting to satisfy everyone will satisfy no one.   The lasting consequence, Hayak suggests, is the inevitable “cry for an economic dictator as a characteristic stage in the movement toward central planning.”   The death of freedom of choice must be the outcome that permits the central planner to achieve his end, because every effort to direct tendencies brings the unforeseen consequence of the individual’s adaptation to the rules, to secure the individual’s best possible outcome against the difference of the definition of good acknowledged by the many individual variations, and the single definition of the central planners.

     The treatise of a long ago theorist has become the running commentary of today’s events and has once again made the obscure economist Hayek a best selling author and a prophet to millions of Americans concerned with the direction of current governmental actions.  The need to eliminate individual variation in decision making and responsibility to achieve a common good – government takeover of mortgage loans, college education loans, credit card and financial lending,  the government take over of health care decisions and insurance, the government takeover of major industries such as the automobile industry, the government regulatory processes to “effect” climate change, social justice, immigration, propagation of non-elected “czars” rather than legislators to effect change – all point to the road map to servitude Hayak pointed out so presciently many years ago. 

     The reason The Road To Serfdom is a best seller again, is because we, as a free society under attack are farther down that road than ever before, and a larger and larger proportion of the populus is recognizing it.

Now You Are Talking Some Real Money…

     We are certainly hopeful that with our first jobs we can hope to pull down 1oo dollars a week spending money.  As we graduate to professions we begin to consider a thousand dollars a week as a very successful marker for security and stability. The very few of us who have achieved specialized sought for occupations may hope for a cool six figures – one hundred thousand dollars a year that identifies us in the top seven percent of all wage earners.  If we aggregate our life time earnings we can envision a million dollars or more over a twenty five to thirty year lifetime of salary.  Then there is the highly gifted professional athlete that in rare cases can rake in 25 million or more a year.  Lastly, the richest man on earth, Senor Helu’, owner of Mexican Telcom, is worth a staggering 53.5 billion.  We can probably agree when we consider such a sum that it is simply unfathomable in size and scope.  Perhaps it would be somewhat easier to focus upon if we consider the fact that Senor Helu’ has the equivalent sum that would allow him if so inclined  to give each resident of Mexico, a country of 107, 550,000 residents,  497,000 dollars in generous gratuity  – if so inclined,  which he isn’t.  Still, that is at least a way to visualize such a remarkable sum of value.

     So, when the government of the United States remarks that it is on its way to its second consecutive year of over 1.4 Trillion dollars in debt, what can we do as regular old human beings to imagine what it is that we owe and should pay our debtors back – if we were so inclined, which we are clearly not.   That is a real cunundrum – certainly there are trillions of bacteria, trillions of stars, trillions of atoms, and trillions of ways that the Chicago Cubs will find to blow any chance at a World Series in our lifetimes – all very difficult to visualize in scope.  I don’t think we can mentally rap ourselves around such numbers, so I believe we are best served by returning to the value unit of the first one hundred dollars we earned.  What would our hundred dollars look like if the United States had to line up one hundred dollar bills to pay its trillion dollar debt? 

     Unfathomable?  Not so fast!  Pagetutor.com has done us an enormous favor in providing scale to what we owe.  Please follow their presentation and reflect on the trillion dollars a year we add to our debt, the 13.5 Trillion we owe to accumulated debt to our debtors,  and the over 100 Trillion we owe in unfunded mandates. 

Aspirin, anybody?